AT Laws
OverviewThis module looks at the mandates of various federal public laws that impact the educational programs and services that children with disabilities receive. Relevant laws can be categorized into three areas: those that influence the students' educational program, those which affect the civil rights of students, and those that effect the provision of assistive technology devices and services. Laws to be addressed in this module include:
These laws can be described as impacting the services that the students with disabilities receive, their educational setting, or both. Some of the laws address more than one area. |
Civil Rights LegislationThe following laws that focus on Civil Rights will be addressed in this section:
|
Special Education LawsThe following Special Education laws will be addressed in this section:
In addition to assurances of civil rights of students with disabilities, other legislation exists that addresses their educational rights. The first major law that guaranteed the right to a public education for all children, ages 5 to 21, was the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975.
The Education for the Handicapped Act (EHA) (P.L. 94-142)The Education for all Handicapped Children Acts is more commonly known as the EHA; it had as its purpose:
EHA Amendments1986 Amendments (P.L. 99-457) |
1990 Amendments (P.L. 101-476)In 1990, amendments were again added to EHA, considerably adding components to the law:
|
1997 Amendments (P.L. 105-17) |
| 1997 amendments further strengthened the rights of students with disabilities.
|
Assistive Technology LegislationThe following laws that focus on AT Legislation will be addressed in this section:
During the 1980's and 90's, the civil and education rights of individuals with disabilities were strengthened. As AT has the potential to provide opportunities for increased independence and participation in all of life's activities, the federal government recognized this ability in the following statement:
Prior to 1988, several laws addressed the potential of AT use by individuals with disabilities, but none mandated its use. Since then, laws specifically addressing the AT needs of persons with disabilities have been passed. |
Technology Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988 (Tech Act) |
| The "Tech Act" provided federal funds to states to develop training and delivery systems for assistive technology devices and services. It required states and territories to develop statewide, consumer-responsive programs of technology-related services for individuals with disabilities of all ages. This act first defined Assistive Technology Devices and Services and promoted the availability and quality of AT devices and services to all individuals, including children. Assistive Technology Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-394)This Tech Act amendment affirms that technology is a valuable tool that can be used to improve the lives of Americans with disabilities. It extends the funding of the 50 states and six territories to develop permanent, comprehensive, statewide programs of technology-related assistance. |
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 1990 (P.L. 101-476) and 1997 (P.L. 105-17)Although the Tech Act first defined AT devices and services, it was IDEA in 1990 that first outlined the school district's responsibility to provide AT to students with disabilities. IDEA also included the Tech Act's Assistive Technology Devices and Services and a specific statement about the school district's role: [IDEA] 300.308 Assistive Technology
Taking all of this together, it is clear that the school district, as a public agency, must ensure that both AT devices and services are provided if "required" for the student to receive a free, appropriate public education (FAPE). It is this determination that is often challenging for schools. It falls to the IEP team to determine what, if any, AT is necessary. However, with the 1997 EHA Amendments stating that AT be "considered" on all student IEPs and its recognition that AT may continue to support the student's access to FAPE outside the school environment to a child's home or in other settings, the use of AT is further strengthened. This "consideration" mandate infers that the IEP team has sufficient knowledge of AT devices and services to make this determination. The law is clearly intended to encourage district personnel to learn about what AT works and what doesn't themselves, as they are best equipped to understand the demands of the environment, the time available, or the skills of the personnel in that environment. (Reed, 2000)
|