AT Laws

Overview

This module looks at the mandates of various federal public laws that impact the educational programs and services that children with disabilities receive. Relevant laws can be categorized into three areas: those that influence the students' educational program, those which affect the civil rights of students, and those that effect the provision of assistive technology devices and services. Laws to be addressed in this module include:

Civil Rights Special Ed AT Laws

These laws can be described as impacting the services that the students with disabilities receive, their educational setting, or both. Some of the laws address more than one area.

copyright © 2000 - 2005 Assistive Technology Training Online Project

 

Civil Rights Legislation

The following laws that focus on Civil Rights will be addressed in this section:

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973: Section 504

»1992 Amendments: Section 508

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-112) Section 504

As part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504 became the first federal civil rights law to protect the rights of individuals with disabilities.

Section 504 provides that:


"no otherwise qualified handicapped individual in the United States shall, solely by reason of his/her handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance"

What does this mean for students?

  • Discrimination against individuals with disabilities is prohibited by the federal government within programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance, including public schools
  • Students who have a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of their major life activities are protected; those who have disabilities such as orthopedic impairments or conditions such as hepatitis, but do not qualify for special education services are included. School districts must implement procedures to ensure that students with disabilities have access to the full range of programs, activities and services.
  • A student's 504 plan describes all reasonable accommodations that include a change in routine, method or approach (RESNA, 1992), and must be stated on the IEP or a separate form. Examples such as changes in time requirements and testing accommodations are included as well as AT devices and services.

Back to top

1992 Reauthorization of the Rehabilitation Act
Section 508 (P.L. 102-569)

In 1992, Section 508 further strengthened the rights of individuals to be provided access to electronic and information technology. It requires that Federal agencies' electronic and information technology -- such as federal Web sites, telecommunications, software, hardware, printers, fax machines, copiers, and information kiosks -- are accessible to people with disabilities. It is working to establish standards for accessibility. Final regulations were published in 2001.

 

Americans with Disabilities Act, 1990
(P.L. 101-336)

In 1990, the ADA was passed, giving full civil rights to all individuals with disabilities. It extends Section 504 by prohibiting discrimination in public and private sector employment, public accommodation, transportation, state and local government services and telecommunications.

For students with disabilities, the ADA prohibits discrimination and extends the right of access to ALL educational programs and services whether or not the school receives federal funding.

Back to top

Civil Rights Special Ed AT Laws

 

copyright © 2000 - 2005 Assistive Technology Training Online Project

 

Special Education Laws

The following Special Education laws will be addressed in this section:

The Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 1975

»1986 Amendments: Preschool and Infant/Toddler Programs

»1990 Amendments: IDEA

»1997 Amendments

In addition to assurances of civil rights of students with disabilities, other legislation exists that addresses their educational rights. The first major law that guaranteed the right to a public education for all children, ages 5 to 21, was the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975.

 

The Education for the Handicapped Act (EHA) (P.L. 94-142)

The Education for all Handicapped Children Acts is more commonly known as the EHA; it had as its purpose:

  • To guarantee a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for all children with disabilities, ages 5-21
  • Special Education and related services must be free, provided by the public agency at no cost to the parents
  • Appropriate education is the provision of regular and special education and related services designed to meet students' individual educational needs.
  • To develop an Individualized Education Program (IEP) for each child eligible for special education and related services; plan is based on multi-disciplinary assessment and includes a statement of specific special education and related services to be provided to the child
  • To the maximum extent appropriate, all children and youth with disabilities will be educated in the least restrictive education (LRE) environment
  • Parents have the right to participate in every decision related to the identification, evaluation, and placement of their child. Parents must give consent for any initial evaluation, assessment or placement decision. Due process procedures assure parents rights to appeal.

Back to top

EHA Amendments

1986 Amendments (P.L. 99-457)
Preschool and Infant/Toddler Programs

In 1986, an amendment to the EHA, extended the purpose of EHA to include children ages 0-5 and included:

  • To extend the guarantee to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) to children with disabilities, ages 3-5.
  • To establish Early Intervention Programs (EIP) for infants and toddlers with disabilities, ages 0-2
  • To develop an Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) for each family with an infant/toddler with disabilities

 

1990 Amendments (P.L. 101-476)

In 1990, amendments were again added to EHA, considerably adding components to the law:

  • To rename the EHA as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The amendment also replaced the phrase "handicapped child" with "child with a disability".
  • To provide Transition Services for students by age 16
  • To extend eligibility to children with autism and traumatic brain injury
  • To define Assistive Technology Devices and Services for children with disabilities for inclusion in the IEP
  • To extend the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) to require the child, to the maximum extent appropriate, be educated with children without disabilities -- in the same class s/he would have been but for the disability

 

1997 Amendments (P.L. 105-17)

1997 amendments further strengthened the rights of students with disabilities.

  • To extend LRE as an assurance that all students would have "access to the general curriculum"
  • To "consider" Assistive Technology Devices and Services on the IEP's of all students. Use of school-purchased AT in a child's home or other settings is required if the child needs access to those devices to receive FAPE.
  • To include orientation and mobility services to the list of related services for children who are blind or have visual impairments, as well as for other children who may also need instruction in traveling around their school, or to and from school.

Back to top

Civil Rights Special Ed AT Laws

 

copyright © 2000 - 2005 Assistive Technology Training Online Project

 

Assistive Technology Legislation

The following laws that focus on AT Legislation will be addressed in this section:

Technology Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act

» Amendments: Assistive Technology Act of 1998

Americans with Disabilities Act

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

During the 1980's and 90's, the civil and education rights of individuals with disabilities were strengthened. As AT has the potential to provide opportunities for increased independence and participation in all of life's activities, the federal government recognized this ability in the following statement:

"...for all individuals, technology can provide important tools for making the performance of tasks quicker and easier, but for some individuals with disabilities, assistive technology is a necessity that enables them to engage in or perform many tasks."

(OSERS, 1989)

Prior to 1988, several laws addressed the potential of AT use by individuals with disabilities, but none mandated its use. Since then, laws specifically addressing the AT needs of persons with disabilities have been passed.

Technology Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988 (Tech Act)
(P.L. 100-407)

The "Tech Act" provided federal funds to states to develop training and delivery systems for assistive technology devices and services. It required states and territories to develop statewide, consumer-responsive programs of technology-related services for individuals with disabilities of all ages. This act first defined Assistive Technology Devices and Services and promoted the availability and quality of AT devices and services to all individuals, including children.

Assistive Technology Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-394)

This Tech Act amendment affirms that technology is a valuable tool that can be used to improve the lives of Americans with disabilities. It extends the funding of the 50 states and six territories to develop permanent, comprehensive, statewide programs of technology-related assistance.

Back to top

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 1990 (P.L. 101-476) and 1997 (P.L. 105-17)

Although the Tech Act first defined AT devices and services, it was IDEA in 1990 that first outlined the school district's responsibility to provide AT to students with disabilities. IDEA also included the Tech Act's Assistive Technology Devices and Services and a specific statement about the school district's role:

[IDEA] 300.308 Assistive Technology
Each public agency shall ensure that assistive technology
devices or assistive technology services or both, as those terms are defined in 300.5 - 300.6 are made available to a child with a disability if required as part of the child's

(a) Special education under 300.17;
(b) Related services under 300.16; or
(c) Supplementary aids and services under 300.550(b)(2).

Taking all of this together, it is clear that the school district, as a public agency, must ensure that both AT devices and services are provided if "required" for the student to receive a free, appropriate public education (FAPE). It is this determination that is often challenging for schools. It falls to the IEP team to determine what, if any, AT is necessary.

However, with the 1997 EHA Amendments stating that AT be "considered" on all student IEPs and its recognition that AT may continue to support the student's access to FAPE outside the school environment to a child's home or in other settings, the use of AT is further strengthened.

This "consideration" mandate infers that the IEP team has sufficient knowledge of AT devices and services to make this determination. The law is clearly intended to encourage district personnel to learn about what AT works and what doesn't themselves, as they are best equipped to understand the demands of the environment, the time available, or the skills of the personnel in that environment.

(Reed, 2000)

Back to top

Civil Rights Special Ed AT Laws

 

copyright © 2000 - 2005 Assistive Technology Training Online Project

 

Schools and AT

In IDEA, children with disabilities, ages birth through 21, must be considered for assistive technology use if it is needed in order to receive a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). These AT devices and services must be identified by their IEP team and their use determined within the natural environment; the one in which they will use the device.

AT devices and services are to be made available to a child with a disability if required as part of the child's

  • special education services,
  • related services, and/or
  • supplementary aids and services,

and a statement of their use and required training must be included on their IEP/IFSP.

School districts are responsible for helping children with disabilities select and acquire assistive technology devices and must assist in training the child and the persons who work with the child, how to most effectively use it. This must be determined on a case-by-case basis at no cost to the parents.

School districts are developing new policies concerning the use of assistive technology devices and services. Some areas being considered include: evaluation and use of devices, informed consent and the relationship of assistive technology and other technology programs with the current curricula offered and the development of long-range technology plans.

In addition, because assistive technology devices represent a significant investment in money and time, school districts need to develop tracking systems, make arrangements for maintenance and repair of devices, investigate sharing/loaning of equipment within single and multiple districts and developing assistive technology assessment teams to work with individual student teams.

 

Mandates and Clarifications

Clarity on the use of AT within school districts will happen as the courts continue to define limitations. To date the following statements reflect AT use by students with disabilities:

  • It is the school district's responsibility (as a public agency) to evaluate, select, acquire and train students and significant personnel in the use of AT devices
  • AT devices needed by a student in multiple environments in order to receive a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) must be provided
  • AT must be identified on a case-by-case basis
  • AT must be provided at no cost to student's parents

Policy Letters

The U.S. Department of Education's Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) has issued several Policy Letters clarifying when a school must provide AT to students with disabilities. A variety of memos have addressed the following concerns: general requirement, evaluations, personally prescribed devices, home use and funding sources.

 

Conclusion

In summary, information has been provided on federal legislation as impacting either the services that children with disabilities receive, their educational setting, or both.

Back to top

 

Civil Rights Special Ed AT Laws

 

copyright © 2000 - 2005 Assistive Technology Training Online Project

 

References

National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities (1989, 1996). Assistive Technology. NICHY News Digest.

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (1989). OSERS News in Print, (2)1.

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. Section 701-794.

RESNA (1992). Technology and the Individualized Education Program. RESNA Press: Washington, DC.

U.S. Congress, Public Law 100-407, Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988.

U.S. Congress, Public Law 101-336, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

U.S. Congress, Public Law 94-142, Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975.

 

RESOURCES/LINKS

Cohen, M.D. of Monahan & Cohen (1998). Comparative Analysis: IDEA, Section 504 and the ADA.

Parette, P., VanBiervliet, A, & Hourcade, J.J. (2000). Family-Centered Decision Making in Assistive Technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 45-55.
http://www.unlv.edu/Colleges/Education/ERC/JSET/

Rosenfeld, S.J. (2000). Section 504 and IDEA: Basic Similarities and Differences. Website: http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/legal_legislative/edlaw504.html
S. James Rosenfeld, Esq.

Texas Assistive Technology Network (2003)
Providing Assistive Technology: A Legal Perspective

WrightsLaw
This site offers hundreds of articles, cases, newsletters, and other information about special education law and advocacy in the Wrightslaw Libraries. Can sign up there for the free, online Special Ed Advocate newsletter.

 

Civil Rights Special Ed AT Laws

 

copyright © 2000 - 2005 Assistive Technology Training Online Project